Gloroots VS Lano
Struggling with Lano's premium pricing and slow resolution times tied to third-party intermediaries? Gloroots connects ambitious teams with elite global candidates and handles employment, payroll, and compliance so you can focus on what really matters: building.

What sets Gloroots apart from Lano?
Gloroots was built to help companies find, hire, and manage global talent. Lano was built primarily as a payroll consolidation and compliance infrastructure platform, with EOR added as a module in a larger, integration-heavy product suite.
By combining recruiting, hiring, and EOR into one connected platform, Gloroots removes the operational gap between finding talent and paying them compliantly, while delivering transparent pricing, faster support, and a simpler path to going live in new markets.
Check out Papaya Global drawbacks directly from its user
What do you dislike about Lano?
Lano's EOR starts at €600 per employee per month, one of the highest entry prices on the market, with additional jurisdiction setup fees and service add-ons increasing total cost.
What do you dislike about Lano?
Lano does not include native recruitment support; talent sourcing requires separate third-party agency integrations at additional cost.
What do you dislike about Lano?
Lano relies on a network of local in-country partners for compliance and EOR delivery, which introduces variability in resolution speed and service consistency across markets.
Hear it from our Customers
Gloroots is the trusted partner you need to scale with confidence
How Gloroots compares
FAQs
Partially. Lano publishes its EOR starting price of €600/month, but payroll outsourcing setup fees apply per jurisdiction, and services like recruiting, background checks, and visas carry additional charges. Gloroots offers one fixed, all-in price at $299/month with no add-ons.
Not natively. Lano offers third-party recruitment agency integrations through its app marketplace, but these are separate engagements at additional cost. Gloroots includes recruiting and hiring support in the base platform, covering the full journey from candidate to compliant employee.
Lano covers 170+ countries through a network of local in-country partners. Gloroots covers 150+ countries with dedicated local experts. While Lano's coverage is broad, reliance on third-party partners means compliance depth and issue resolution speed can vary by market.
Gloroots can get teams hiring in as fast as 48 hours with a 6-step guided process. Lano's EOR onboarding can take under two weeks, but full payroll consolidation setup across multiple jurisdictions can take several weeks and requires significant initial configuration effort.
Lano's core team is praised for its responsiveness and personability. However, resolution of complex EOR and compliance queries is often tied to third-party partner availability, leading to occasional delays. Gloroots provides 24/7 direct human support, with all issues handled in-house across every time zone.
Lano is well-suited for established companies with existing payroll infrastructure that need a consolidation layer. For early-stage or fast-scaling teams that need a simple, fast, and affordable path from hiring to payroll, Gloroots is purpose-built with no complex setup, no integration overhead, and a starting price less than half of Lano's.




